The Battle for the Future of AI: Google Bard vs ChatGPT

The battle for artificial intelligence's future is ramping up, with two of the most sophisticated language models, Bard and ChatGPT, battling for mastery. OpenAI's ChatGPT is a larger language model than Google AI's Bard. Both of the models can generate text, translate languages, create other sorts of creative content, and answer queries. There are, however, some noticeable variations between the two models. In this article, the battle for the future of AI: Google Bard vs ChatGPT, we are going to discuss the bard ai and chatGPT use cases to analyse which one is the best.

Google Bard

Bard ai is a huge language model from Google AI that was trained on a massive text and code dataset. Bard can generate literature, translate languages, create many types of creative content, and provide informed answers to your questions. Although Bard is still in development, it has already mastered how to accomplish a variety of tasks, including:

>  to follow your instructions and accomplish your requests conscientiously.

>  Answer your questions in a thorough and instructive manner, even if they are open-ended, difficult, or unusual.

>  To create many creative text formats of text material, such as poems, code, screenplays, musical pieces, emails, letters, and so on. 

>  To meet all of your needs by utilizing all of its knowledge. 

ChatGPT

ChatGPT is an OpenAI large language model that was trained on an enormous text and code dataset. ChatGPT is able to generate text, translate languages, create other types of creative material, and provide informed answers to your questions. People have even afraid of the concern Is ChatGPT A Threat To Developers? ChatGPT is still in progress, but it has been taught to do a variety of jobs, including:

>  ChatGPT has the ability to generate realistic and cohesive chat dialogues.

>  ChatGPT will respond to your questions in an instructive manner, even if they are open-ended, difficult, or unusual.

>  ChatGPT may create a variety of creative stuff, such as poems, code, screenplays, musical compositions, emails, letters, and so on.

Now that you have a basic understanding of both chatbots, let's go into the specific distinctions. The discussion between Google Bard and ChatGTP has many people thinking. While both chatbots possess their own set of capabilities, there are some significant variations between the two. The most significant of these are:

Coding Ability

One of the most popular ways people have used ChatGPT is to have its code for them. The AI chatbot excels at creating complicated code in a variety of languages. Anyone who has spent enough time on Twitter will be aware that people have used ChatGPT to create games and even full-fledged chatbots. Not only can the AI chatbot generate code, but it can also debug many instances of it.

Google Bard, on the other hand, cannot code right away yet. Just pausing a  moment. If you're looking for Python developers, hire Python developers in India who are proficient and professional. Now back to our topic. Google said on its FAQ website that Bard cannot help with programming because it does not yet offer code responses. When we tried to get Bard to code, however, it created HTML and Javascript code. We also fed it to ChatGPT, which discovered a few flaws in Bard's code. It automatically fixed them, and the code was ready to use. However, it is clear that ChatGPT has an advantage when it comes to code.

User Interface

Bard's user interface, like that of many Google products, is straightforward and minimalistic. There's a text window, a place to insert prompts, and that's about it. Notably, unlike ChatGPT, there does not seem to be a chat history tab. This means you won't be able to quickly retrieve prior Bard chats. These exchanges appear to be more transient.

Also, read How AI Can Help Mobile Apps for Healthcare?

In general, the Bard interface is simple and easy to use. Whereas the ChatGPT interface appears to be more functional and business-like, Bard feels a bit more like a tool aimed at folks who visit Google with the intention of conducting a search.

Speed

Bard Ai is a sharp thinker. It is capable of producing 500 words in 9.5 seconds with a vast amount of text. Bard also answers everything instantly, but ChatGPT writes everything out as if it were a word processor. Large Language Models, on the contrary hand, aren't adept at counting.ChatGPT reacts in 3 minutes and 2 seconds with 428 words. For the time being, though, Bard outperforms ChatGPT.

Capabilities

Thus far, it appears that Bard will prevail because it is both attractive and speedier. However, when it comes to the real material, the system's performance rapidly degrades. Bard's UI has limitations in terms of its functionality. Google expressly notes that "some of the responses may be inaccurate" and that Bard adheres to stringent rules.

These include:

>  "Built-in safety controls" prevent malicious or destructive responses.

>  Limitations that are seen to be leading Bard to refuse to respond rather than write an answer that may be incorrect or beyond its capabilities.

Whereas ChatGPT will often try — and often succeed — at almost anything you ask of it, Bard is significantly more adept at saying "No" or just telling you that something is outside of its range of abilities.

Hallucination

With widespread Internet connectivity, one would believe that Google Bard AI could effortlessly create replies and make no mistakes. However, our earlier conversation retention test plainly contradicted this. Unfortunately, Bard AI is prone to hallucinating and providing incorrect information. While not on purpose, the AI can confidently disseminate false information while believing it to be accurate. For example, when questioned about the most recent earthquake in India in 2023, Bard AI referred to an incident from the previous year. In truth, an earthquake had occurred just a couple of hours before, with extensive coverage available online.

Also, learn about 10 mistakes that might destroy your new website.

ChatGPT is also susceptible to delusion. However, when compared to GPT-3, the bot's newer GPT-4 model claims to have reduced hallucinations by 35%. This version has been tested by a large number of individuals, and according to us, ChatGPT has improved and lessened hallucinations.

When it comes to Bard AI not hallucinating, it may be too early to expect it to be totally functional. Because this is the first iteration of the company, it will undergo its own stages of faults and delusions before being improved. As it is, ChatGPT has the most accurate model for the time being.

Crediting Sources

They all output data from datasets, as is common with AI chatbots. They are trained using a wide range of data samples, including words, chats, photos, and more. As a result, both ChatGPT and Bard have their own datasets from which they derive replies. However, AI bots like Google Bard and Bing have Internet access. A combination of these elements enables bots to re-create information and deliver it to users.

Despite having real-time access to the Internet, Google Bard AI performs a bad job at crediting sources or even wording its own facts in some cases.  However, a specific draught Bard not only took the text from our own website word for word but also omitted to credit it as a source.

Language Assistance

ChatGPT's most recent GPT-4 language model now supports even more languages. The most recent LLM has shown support for over 26 languages. These include a wide range of languages such as French, Spanish, Arabic, Mandarin, Italian, and many others. As a result, ChatGPT is a very sophisticated bot that can communicate in a variety of languages.

For the time being, Google Bard only supports US English. While Google has stated that it is working on enabling Bard to speak in other languages, the AI bot feels it is capable of doing so right now. When asked how many languages it can speak, it gave the same answer as below. However, Google Bard was unable to generate a poem in French. Only time will tell which languages are introduced first and when.

Conversation Retention

Conversation retention is already available in a range of AI chatbots. For those who are unaware, this effectively implies that the chatbot will use what you've said to it before to provide future responses. So, if you previously asked a bot for a recipe, it can respond to subsequent requests without forgetting the context. ChatGPT is capable of conversation retention. The model of the AI bot can recall up to 3,000 words from the present discussion. It cannot, however, access its previous communication to formulate responses. nevertheless, it does a decent job of maintaining the pace.

Google Bard at present terrible at retaining context. When asked a follow-up question after the request for knock-knock jokes, Google Bard AI responded very differently. Google has expressly said that Bard AI's capacity to hold context is intentionally limited for the time being. The bot's contextual skills should improve as it learns more. However, if you're looking for a clear winner between Bard and ChatGPT on this, the latter comes out on top.

 

Bard vs ChatGPT in a Nutshell

 

Bard and ChatGPT are powerful language models, although they differ significantly in several ways. Bard has been instructed on more text and code data than ChatGPT, providing it with a broader set of skills. Bard can also use Google Search to retrieve and understand information from the real world, providing it with an advantage in terms of factual accuracy. ChatGPT, on the flip hand, may generate more interesting and innovative language than Bard, giving it an advantage in terms of visual appeal.

Hope this article the Battle for the Future of AI: Google Bard vs ChatGPT will come in handy for you. The "better" option between ChatGPT and Google depends on the specific use case and the desired outcome. Both have their own strengths and weaknesses, and their suitability will vary based on individual requirements. As a web development company in India, we are eminent to do the works that ai can’t reach out to us for our human assistance as humans can always do more.